Archives of Acoustics, 44, 2, pp. 349–355, 2019
10.24425/aoa.2019.128498

Selection of Exposure Parameters for a HIFU Ablation System Using an Array of Thermocouples and Numerical Simulations

Łukasz FURA
Institute of Fundamental Technological Research Polish Academy of Sciences
Poland

Tamara KUJAWSKA
Institute of Fundamental Technological Research Polish Academy of Sciences
Poland

Image-guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) technique is dynamically developing technology for treating solid tumors due to its non-invasive nature. Before a HIFU ablation system is ready for use, the exposure parameters of the HIFU beam capable of destroying the treated tissue without damaging the surrounding tissues should be selected to ensure the safety of therapy. The purpose of this work was to select the threshold acoustic power as well as the step and rate of movement of the HIFU beam, generated by a transducer intended to be used in the HIFU ablation system being developed, by using an array of thermocouples and numerical simulations. For experiments a bowl-shaped 64-mm, 1.05 MHz HIFU transducer with a 62.6 mm focal length (f-number 0.98) generated pulsed waves propagating in two-layer media: water/ex vivo pork loin tissue (50 mm/40 mm) was used. To determine a threshold power of the HIFU beam capable of creating the necrotic lesion in a small volume within the tested tissue during less than 3 s each tissue sample was sonicated by multiple parallel HIFU beams of different acoustic power focused at a depth of 12.6 mm below the tissue surface. Location of the maximum heating as well as the relaxation time of the tested tissue were determined from temperature variations recorded during and after sonication by five thermo-couples placed along the acoustic axis of each HIFU beam as well as from numerical simulations. The obtained results enabled to assess the location of each necrotic lesion as well as to determine the step and rate of the HIFU beam movement. The location and extent of the necrotic lesions created was verified using ultrasound images of tissue after sonication and visual inspection after cutting the samples. The threshold acoustic power of the HIFU beam capable of creating the local necrotic lesion in the tested tissue within 3 s without damaging of surrounding tissues was found to be 24 W, and the pause between sonications was found to be more than 40 s.
(f-number 0.98) and propagated in two-layer media: water/ex vivo pork loin tissue (50mm/40mm). The thickness of a water layer was determined from a nonlinear propagation model. To determine a threshold power of the HIFU beam capable of creating a necrotic lesion in small volume within a tested tissue during exposure less than 3s the tissue samples were sonicated by parallel HIFU beams with a varied acoustic power (8W - 36W) focused at a depth of 12.6 mm below the tissue surface. The location of the maximum heating spot induced by these beams as well as the tissue relaxation time were determined from temperatures recorded by a thermocouple array placed on the acoustic axis of each HIFU beam. The results obtained enabled to detect the location of necrotic lesions as well as the scanning speed of the tumor by means of the HIFU beam focus. The location of necrotic lesions was verified by ultrasonic images of tissue samples after their sonication and by visual inspection of visible lesions after cutting the samples. Results of the experiments showed that the threshold acoustic power of the HIFU beam capable of creating local necrotic lesion in the ex vivo pork loin tissue within 3s without damaging of surrounding tissue structures amounted to 24 W, and the interval between exposures, resulting from the relaxation time of tissue, was above 40 seconds.
Keywords: automated HIFU ablation system; threshold acoustic power of HIFU beam; ex vivo tissue; necrotic lesion; thermocouple array
Full Text: PDF
Copyright © The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0).

References

Duck F.A. (1990), Physical properties of tissue: a comprehensive reference book, pp. 139, Academic Press, London

Fry W.J., Fry F.J., Barnard J.W., Krumins R.F., Brennan J.F. (1955), Ultrasonic lesions in the mammalian central nervous system, Science, 122, 3168, 517–518, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.122.3168.517.

Hynynen K., Jones R.M. (2016), Image-guided ultrasound phased arrays are a disruptive technology for non-invasive therapy, Physics in Medicine & Biology, 61, 17, 206–248, https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/61/17/R206.

Koch T., Lakshmanan S., Brand S., Wicke M., Raum K., Moerlein D. (2011), Ultrasound velocity and attenuation of porcine soft tissues with respect to structure and composition: I. Muscle, Meat Science, 88, 1, 51–58, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.12.002.

Kujawska T., Dera W., Dziekonski C. (2017), Automated bimodal ultrasound device for preclinical testing of HIFU technique in treatment of solid tumors implanted into small animals, Hydroacoustics, 20, 93–98.

Kujawska T., Secomski W., Kruglenko E., Krawczyk K., Nowicki A. (2014), Determination of tissue thermal conductivity by measuring and modeling temperature rise induced in tissue by pulsed focused ultrasound, PlosONE, 9, 4, 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094929.

Law W.K., Frizzell L.A., Dunn F. (1985), Determination of the nonlinearity parameter B/A of biological media, Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 11, 2, 307–318, https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-5629(85)90130-9.

Nassiri D.K., Nicholas D., Hill C.R. (1979), Attenuation of ultrasound in skeletal muscle, Ultrasonics, 17, 5, 230–232, https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-624X(79)90054-4

Orsi F., Arnone P., Chen W., Zhang L. (2010), High intensity focused ultrasound ablation: a new therapeutic option for solid tumors, Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics, 6, 4, 414–420, https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1482.77064

Rasband W.S. (1997-2018), ImageJ, U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA, from https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/

Soneson J (2011), HIFU Simulator v1.2, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, from https://www.fda.gov/.

ter Haar G. (2007), Therapeutic applications of ultrasound, Progress Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 93, 1–3, 111–129, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2006.07.005.

ter Haar G. (2016), HIFU tissue ablation: concept and devices, [in:] Escoffre J.M., Bouakaz A. [Eds.], Therapeutic ultrasound. Advances in experimental medicine and biology, Vol. 880, pp. 3–20, Springer, Cham, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22536-4_1.

Wójcik J., Nowicki A., Lewin P.A., Bloomfield P.E., Kujawska T., Filipczynski L. (2006), Wave envelopes method for description of nonlinear acoustic wave propagation, Ultrasonics, 44, 3, 310–329, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2006.04.001.

Zhou Y.F. (2011), High intensity focused ultrasound in clinical tumor ablation, World Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2, 1, 8–27, https://doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v2.i1.8.




DOI: 10.24425/aoa.2019.128498