Archives of Acoustics, 45, 1, pp. 153–163, 2020

Acoustic Characterization of a Room: Study Case Between Simulation and a Portable Method



Large venues and auditoriums are commonly associated with their astounding architecture. Their acoustic quality is an essential factor in its qualification as a great and functional, or a badly designed place. However, acoustics is often overlooked during the design stage of a building due to the complexity and high cost of the measurements involved. For this reason, it is important to explore more accessible ways to implement acoustics evaluations. The aim of this work is to compare typical experimental measuring methods and the use of mobile devices to assess the acoustic quality of a room. These measurements are contrasted with the software simulation of the same acoustical space. The results show that the mobile system can be used for professional measurements with low restrictions in the frequency range of interest of this study (90 Hz to 4000 Hz).
Keywords: architectural acoustics; acoustical parameters of room; room acoustics; mobile devices
Full Text: PDF
Copyright © The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0).


Aumond P. et al. (2017), A study of the accuracy of mobile technology for measuring urban noise pollution in large scale participatory sensing campaigns, Applied Acoustics, 117: 219–226, doi: 10.1016 /j.apacoust.2016.07.011.

Bluyssen P.M., Zhang D., Kurvers S., Overtoom M., Ortiz-Sanchez M. (2018), Self-reported health and comfort of school children in 54 classrooms of 21 Dutch school buildings, Building and Environment, 138: 106–123, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.04.032.

Brown R., Evans L. (2011), Acoustics and the smartphone, Proceedings of ACOUSTICS, November 2–4, 2011, Gold Coast, Australia, paper No. 106.

Catt acoustics, from

Choi Y.J. (2017), Comparison of two types of combined measures, STI and U50, for predicting speech intelligibility in classrooms, Archives of Acoustics, 42(3): 527–532, doi: 10.1515/aoa-2017-0056.

Choi Y.J. (2018), Effects of the distribution of occupants in partially occupied classrooms, Applied Acoustics, 140: 1–12, doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2018.05.015.

Cowan J.P. (2016), The effects of sound on people, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.

Devarakonda S., Sevusu P., Liu H., Liu R., Iftode L., Nath B. (2013), Real-time air quality monitoring through mobile sensing in metropolitan areas, Proceedings of 2nd ACM SIGKDD International workshop on urban computing, Chicago, Illinois, USA, Article No.: 15, 8 pages, doi: 10.1145/2505821.2505834.

Dick D.A., Vigeant M.C. (2016), A comparison of measured room acoustics metrics using a spherical microphone array and conventional methods, Applied Acoustics, 107: 34–45, doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2016.01.008.

DiMarino C. et al. (2011), Acoustic enhancement of proposed grand lecture hall using computer simulation, Canadian Acoustics, 39(1): 43–48,

D’Orazio D., Rossi E., Garai M. (2018), Comparison of different in situ measurements techniques of intelligibility in an open-plan office, Building Acoustics, 25(2): 111–122, doi: 10.1177/1351010X18776431.

Dutta P. et al. (2009), Common sense: participatory urban sensing using a network of handheld air quality monitors, [In:] Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on embedded networked sensor systems, pp. 349–350.

Escobar V.G., Morillas J.B. (2015), Analysis of intelligibility and reverberation time recommendations in educational rooms, Applied Acoustics, 96: 1–10, doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2015.03.001.

Fausti P., Farina A. (2000), Acoustic measurements in opera houses: comparison between different techniques and equipment, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 232(1): 213–229, doi: 10.1006/jsvi.1999.2694.

Gómez-Tejedor J.A., Castro-Palacio J.C., Monsoriu J.A. (2014), The acoustic Doppler effect applied to the study of linear motions, European Journal of Physics, 35(2): 025006, doi: 10.1088/0143-0807/35/2/025006.

González M.Á., González M.Á. (2016), Smartphones as experimental tools to measure acoustical and mechanical properties of vibrating rods, European Journal of Physics, 37(4): 045701, doi: 10.1088/0143-0807/37/4/045701.

Hawley S.H., McClain R.E. (2016), Visualizing sound directivity via smartphone sensors, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 56(2): 72–74, doi: 10.1119/1.5021430.

Hodgson M. (1999), Experimental investigation of the acoustical characteristics of university classrooms, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106(4): 1810–1819, doi: 10.1121/1.427931.

Ibarra D., Ledesma R., Lopez E. (2018), Design and construction of an omnidirectional sound source with inverse filtering approach for optimization, HardwareX, 4: e00033, doi: 10.1016/j.ohx.2018.e00033.

ISO 3382-1: 2009: Acoustics – Measurement of room acoustic parameters – Part 1: Performance spaces.

Kanjo E. (2010), Noisespy: A real-time mobile phone platform for urban noise monitoring and mapping, Mobile Networks and Applications, 15(4), 562–574, doi: 10.1007/s11036-009-0217-y.

Khan S.I., Jawarkar N.P., Ahmed V. (2012), Cell phone based remote early detection of respiratory disorders for rural children using modified stethoscope, International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies, pp. 936–940, Rajkot, India, doi: 10.1109/CSNT.2012.199.

Klein P., Hirth M., Gröber S., Kuhn J., Müller A. (2014), Classical experiments revisited: smartphones and tablet PCs as experimental tools in acoustics and optics, Physics Education, 49(4): 412–418, doi: 10.1088/0031-9120/49/4/412.

Kuhn J., Vogt P. (2013), Analyzing acoustic phenomena with a smartphone microphone, The Physics Teacher, 51(2): 118–119, doi: 10.1119/1.4775539.

Maisonneuve N., Stevens M., Niessen M.E., Steels L. (2009), NoiseTube: Measuring and mapping noise pollution with mobile phones, [in:] Information technologies in environmental engineering, Athanasiadis I., Mitkas P., Rizzoli A., Marx J. [Eds], pp. 215–228, Springer, Berlin–Heidelberg, doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-88351-7_16.

Nam Y., Kong Y., Reyes B., Reljin N., Chon K.H. (2016), Monitoring of heart and breathing rates using dual cameras on a smartphone, PloS one, 11(3): e0151013, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151013.

Nowoświat A., Olechowska M. (2016), Investigation studies on the application of reverberation time, Archives of Acoustics, 41(1): 15–26, doi: 10.1515/aoa-2016-0002.

Nowoświat A., Olechowska M. (2017), Estimation of reverberation time in classrooms using the residual minimization method, Archives of Acoustics, 42(4): 609–617, doi: 10.1515/aoa-2017-0065.

Rana R.K., Chou C.T., Kanhere S.S., Bulusu N., Hu W. (2010), Ear-phone: an end-to-end participatory urban noise mapping system, Proceedings of 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, pp. 105–116, Stockholm, Sweden, doi: 10.1145/1791212.1791226.

Reddy S., Parker A., Hyman J., Burke J., Estrin D., Hansen M. (2007), Image browsing, processing, and clustering for participatory sensing, Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Embedded Networked Sensors, pp. 13–17, Cork, Ireland, doi: 10.1145/1278972.1278975.

Reyes B., Reljin N., Chon K. (2014), Tracheal sounds acquisition using smartphones, Sensors, 14(8): 13830–13850, doi: 10.3390/s140813830.

Rizzi L., Ghelfi G., Campanini S., Rosati A. (2015), Rapid room acoustics parameters measurements with smartphones, 22nd International Congress on Sound & Vibration, pp. 1–8, Florence, Italy.

ODEON – Room Acoustics Simulations and Measurements, from:

Rubel P. et al.(2005), Toward personal eHealth in cardiology. Results from the EPI-MEDICS telemedicine project, Journal of Electrocardiology, 38(4, Supplement): 100–106, doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2005.06.011.

Saba M.M., da S. Rosa R.A. (2003), The Doppler effect of a sound source moving in a circle, The Physics Teacher, 41(2): 89–91, doi: 10.1119/1.1542044.

Sans J.A., Manjón F.J., Pereira A.L.J., Gómez-Tejedor J.A., Monsoriu J.A. (2013), Oscillations studied with the smartphone ambient light sensor, European Journal of Physics, 34(6): 1349–1354, doi: 10.1088/0143-0807/34/6/1349.

Satoh F., Sakagami K., Omoto A. (2016), Application of a smartphone for introductory teaching of sound environment: Validation of the precision of the devices and examples of students' work, Acoustical Science and Technology, 37(4): 165–172, doi: 10.1250/ast.37.165.

Scherr D., Zweiker R., Kollmann A., Kastner P., Schreier G., Fruhwald F.M. (2006), Mobile phone-based surveillance of cardiac patients at home, Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 12(5): 255–261, doi: 10.1258/135763306777889046.

Scully C.G. et al. (2012), Physiological parameter monitoring from optical recordings with a mobile phone, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 59(2): 303–306, doi: 10.1109/TBME.2011.2163157.

Schroeder M.R. (1965), New method of measuring reverberation time, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 37(3): 409–412, doi: 10.1121/1.1909343.

Software – EASE – Enhanced Acoustic Simulator for Engineers, from:

SoundCity : a mobile application for understanding your exposure to noise pollution – Inria, from:

SoundPrint – Find your quiet place, from:

Stansfeld S.A., Matheson M.P. (2003), Noise pollution: non-auditory effects on health, British Medical Bulletin, 68(1): 243–257, doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldg033.

Ventola C.L. (2014), Social media and health care professionals: benefits, risks, and best practices, Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 39(7): 491–520,

Wong A.C., Ryan A.F. (2015), Mechanisms of sensorineural cell damage, death and survival in the cochlea, Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 7: article 58, doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00058.

Zannin P.H.T., Zwirtes D.P.Z. (2009), Evaluation of the acoustic performance of classrooms in public schools, Applied Acoustics, 70(4): 626–635, doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2008.06.007.

DOI: 10.24425/aoa.2020.132491