Assessment of Noise from Different Types of Rounds Fired from a Saluting Gun

Downloads

Authors

  • Gurmail S. PADDAN Institute of Naval Medicine, United Kingdom
  • Matt J. HOWELL Institute of Naval Medicine, United Kingdom

Abstract

The difference in sound pressure levels between two types of rounds fired from a saluting gun has been investigated; the rounds being identified as ‘current’ and ‘new’. A 3-pounder saluting gun mounted on a concrete floor based at HMNB Portsmouth, UK, was used in the survey. Sound pressure levels were measured at the two people responsible for operating the gun: the firer and the loader. Twelve current rounds and 24 new rounds were fired during the survey. The new rounds showed a greater variation in peak sound pressure levels between rounds (interquartile range of 2.1 dB, firer’s location) compared with the current rounds (interquartile range of 1.1 dB, firer’s location). The highest C-weighted peak sound pressure levels for the firer were 173.1 dB for the current round compared with 166.8 dB for the new round. The corresponding highest C-weighted peak sound pressure levels for the loader were 170.6 dB and 163.0 dB, respectively. The difference between median peak sound pressure levels was 8.8 dB for the firer and 9.8 dB for the loader. Similar differences were measured in sound exposure levels between the two types of rounds. Frequency data presented can be used for assessing the suitability of appropriate hearing protectors. Mitigation measures are proposed for further reducing noise exposure of the operators.

Keywords:

peak sound pressure level, 3-pounder round, saluting gun, blank ammunition

References

1. Archive.org (2024), Time Gun Maps of 1861. Available from: https://web.archive.org/web/20090212115320/http://www.edinphoto.org.uk/0_maps_2/0_map_edinburgh_time-gun_1861_-_map_notes.htm. (Accessed on 5 August 2024).

2. British Standard Institution (2013), Electroacoustics - Sound level meters - Specifications. BS EN 61672-1:2013/ IEC 61672-1:2013.

3. Department of Defense (1997), Noise Limits. Military Standard. Department of Defense Design Criteria Standard. MIL-STD-1474D. USA. 12 Feb 1997.

4. Flamme, G., Murphy, W.J., Kardous, C.A., Byrne, D.C. (2019), Impulsive exposures from ceremonial and signal cannons. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 145, pp 1815. doi.org/10.1121/1.5101634.

5. Health and Safety Executive (2021), Controlling noise at work. The Control of Noise at Work Regulations 2005 – Guidance on Regulations. HSE Books. L108. Third Edition. Crown copyright 2021. ISBN 978 0 7176 6567 9. Available from: http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/books/l108.htm. (Accessed on 6 August 2024).

6. Ministry of Defence (2015), The Measurement of Impulse Noise from Military Weapons, Explosives and Pyrotechnics; and Selection of Hearing Protection. Defence Standard 00-027. Issue 3. May 2015.

7. Paddan, G.S., Howell, M.J. (2019), Assessment of noise exposure during firing of saluting guns at HMNB Portsmouth. INM Report 2019.027. Institute of Naval Medicine, Gosport. December 2019.

8. Paddan, G.S., Howell, M.J. (2022), A comparison of noise produced by blank and live rounds fired from military rifles. Applied Acoustics, 189, 1-7. doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2021.108599.

9. Paddan, G.S., Howell, M.J. (2024), Measurement and analysis of noise produced by ‘flash-bang’ hand grenade distraction devices. Manuscript in preparation and awaiting submission.

10. Primetake (2024), Ceremonial Saluting Ammunition. Product Information. Available from: https://primetake.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2016/03/Saluting.pdf. (Accessed on 5 September 2024).

11. Telegraph (2024), Edinburgh Castle gun salute to be made quieter after ‘health and safety killjoys’ complain. Quieter ammunition to be used in one o’clock salute after safety notice was issued over Army noise trials. Available from: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/04/01/edinburgh-castle-gun-made-quieter-amid-health-safety-rules/. (Accessed on 5 September 2024).