Single-Sensor Passive Ranging of Underwater Monopoles Using Near-Field/Far-Field Energy Contrasts

Downloads

Authors

  • Saier MAHMOUD Department of Electronic and Mechanical Systems, Higher Institute for Applied Sciences and Technology, Syria
  • Louay SALEH Department of Electronic and Mechanical Systems, Higher Institute for Applied Sciences and Technology, Syria
  • Ibrahim CHOUAIB Department of Electronic and Mechanical Systems, Higher Institute for Applied Sciences and Technology, Syria

Abstract

While acoustic vector sensors (AVS) are well-established for detection and direction-of-arrival (DOA) estimation using co-located pressure and particle motion (PM) measurements, their potential for passive range estimation remains largely unexplored. This paper introduces a novel single-AVS method for passive range estimation to an acoustic monopole source by exploiting the fundamental near-field dominance of PM energy. We derive the frequency and the distance dependent ratio (ξ) of kinetic to potential acoustic energy density – a key near-field signature inaccessible to conventional hydrophones. By leveraging simultaneous AVS pressure and PM velocity measurements, our method estimates ξ, inverts the monopole near-field model to obtain the Helmholtz number, and directly computes the range. Crucially, we demonstrate that PM sensors offer a potential signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) advantage over pressure sensors within the near-field (>7.8 dB). Validation under simulated noise conditions shows accurate range estimation (RMSE <10 %) for low-frequency sources (<100 Hz) within 8 m–25m ranges at 0 dB SNRs, with performance degrading as frequency increases or SNR decreases. Critically, robustness is confirmed using recorded basin noise profiles, overcoming the isotropic Gaussian noise assumption. This technique extends AVS functionality beyond DOA, enabling single-sensor passive ranging without arrays, environmental priors, or reference signals where conventional methods fail.

Keywords:

monopole source, passive ranging, acoustic vector sensor (AVS), particle motion (PM), near-field acoustics, underwater acoustics, energy ratio, single-sensor localization

References


  1. Abraham D.A. (2019), Underwater Acoustic Signal Processing: Modeling, Detection, and Estimation, Springer.

  2. Cole A.M. (2019), Automated open circuit scuba diver detection with low cost passive sonar and machine learning, Msc. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, United States.

  3. Eleftherakis D., Vicen-Bueno R. (2020), Sensors to increase the security of underwater communication cables: A review of underwater monitoring sensors, Sensors, 20(3): 737, https://doi.org/10.3390/s20030737.

  4. Ferguson B.G., Lo K.W., Rodgers J.D. (2010), Sensing the underwater acoustic environment with a single hydrophone onboard an undersea glider, [in:] OCEANS’10 IEEE Sydney, https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANSSYD.2010.5603889.

  5. Gray M., Rogers P.H., Zeddies D.G. (2016), Acoustic particle motion measurement for bioacousticians: Principles and pitfalls, [in:] Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, 27(1): 010022, https://doi.org/10.1121/2.0000290.

  6. Hari V.N., Chitre M., Too Y.M., Pallayil V. (2015), Robust passive diver detection in shallow ocean, [in:] OCEANS 2015 – Genova, https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANS-Genova.2015.7271656.

  7. Hovem J.M. (2007), Underwater acoustics: Propagation, devices and systems, Journal of Electroceramics, 19: 339–347, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10832-007-9059-9.

  8. Jansen H.W., Brouns E., Prior M.K. (2017), Vector sensors and acoustic calibration procedures, TNO report (TNO 2017 R11589).

  9. Jansen H.W., Prior M.K., Brouns E. (2019), On the conversion between sound pressure and particle motion, [in:] Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, 37(1): 070012, https://doi.org/10.1121/2.0001280.

  10. Jin B., Xu G. (2020), A passive detection method of divers based on deep learning, [in:] IEEE 3rd International Conference on Electronics Technology, pp. 650–655, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICET49382.2020.9119556.

  11. Kalmijn Ad.J. (1988), Hydrodynamic and acoustic field detection, [in:] Sensory Biology of Aquatic Animals, pp. 83–130, Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3714-3_4.

  12. Kaushal H., Kaddoum G. (2016), Underwater optical wireless communication, IEEE Access, 4: 1518–1547, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2552538.

  13. Korenbaum V., Kostiv A., Gorovoy S., Dorozhko V., Shiryaev A. (2020), Underwater noises of open-circuit scuba diver, Archives of Acoustics, 45(2): 349–357, https://doi.org/10.24425/aoa.2020.133155.

  14. Krishnaveni V., Kesavamurthy T., B. Aparna (2013), Beamforming for direction-of-arrival (DOA) estimation – A survey, International Journal of Computer Applications, 61(11): 4–11, https://doi.org/10.5120/9970-4758.

  15. Levin D., Habets E.A.P., Gannot S. (2012), Maximum likelihood estimation of direction of arrival using an acoustic vector-sensor, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131(2): 1240–1248, https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3676699.

  16. Li X., Chen H., Lu H., Bi X., Mo Y. (2023), A method of underwater sound source range estimation without prior knowledge based on single sensor in shallow water, Frontiers in Physics, 11: 1109220, https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2023.1109220.

  17. Liang N., Zhou J., Yang Y. (2022), Single hydrophone passive source range estimation using phase-matched filter, Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 10(7): 866, https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10070866.

  18. Lin H., Bengisu T., Mourelatos Z.P. (2021), Lecture Notes on Acoustics and Noise Control, Springer.

  19. Lohrasbipeydeh H., Gulliver T.A., Zielinski A., Dakin T. (2013), Single hydrophone passive source range and depth estimation in shallow water, [in:] OCEANS 2013 MTS/IEEE Bergen, https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANS-Bergen.2013.6608042.

  20. Mahmoud S., Saleh L., Chouaib I. (2025), Experimental results of diver detection in harbor environments using single acoustic vector sensor, Archives of Acoustics, 50(2): 173–185, https://doi.org/10.24425/aoa.2025.153663.

  21. Nedelec S.L. et al. (2021), Best practice guide for underwater particle motion measurement for biological applications, Technical report by the University of Exeter for the IOGP Marine Sound and Life Joint Industry Programme, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356911609.

  22. Saheban H., Kordrostami Z. (2021), Hydrophones, fundamental features, design considerations, and various structures: A review, Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 329: 112790, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2021.112790.

  23. Silvia M.T., Richards R.T. (2002), A theoretical and experimental investigation of low-frequency acoustic vector sensors, [in:] OCEANS ’02 MTS/IEEE, 3: 1887–1898, https://doi.org/10.1109/oceans.2002.1191918.

  24. Soldani M., Faggioni O., Zunino R., Carbone A., Gemma M. (2022), The LAMA system: A “smart” magnetometer network for harbour protection, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 204: 104743, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2022.104743.

  25. Sutin A., Salloum H., Delorme M., Sedunov N., Sedunov A., Tsionskiy M. (2013), Stevens passive acoustic system for surface and underwater threat detection, [in:] 2013 IEEE International Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security (HST), pp. 195–200, https://doi.org/10.1109/THS.2013.6698999.

  26. Tichavsky P., Wong K.T., Zoltowski M.D. (2001), Near-field/far-field azimuth and elevation angle estimation using a single vector hydrophone, [in:] IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 49(11): 2498–2510, https://doi.org/10.1109/78.960397.

  27. Tu Q., Yuan F., Yang W., Cheng E. (2020), An approach for diver passive detection based on the established model of breathing sound emission, Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 8(1): 44, https://doi.org/10.3390/JMSE8010044.

  28. Yuan M., Wang C., Da L., Li Q. (2022), Signal detection method using a single vector hydrophone in ocean acoustics, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 152(2): 789–798. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0013219.

  29. Zhao A., Ma L., Hui J., Zeng C., Bi X. (2018), Open-lake experimental investigation of azimuth angle estimation using a single acoustic vector sensor, Journal of Sensors, 2018: 4324902, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4324902.