The Impact of the VR Interface on the Accuracy and Ergonomics of Spatial Hearing Tests

Downloads

Authors

  • Grzegorz Rusinek Warsaw University of Technology, Poland
  • Agnieszka Paula Pietrzak Warsaw University of Technology, Poland ORCID ID 0000-0002-2976-9476

Abstract

In recent years, virtual reality (VR) has been an attractive alternative to traditional methods of conducting hearing tests, offering both a natural way to indicate sound direction and complete digital data recording. The aim of this study was to analyze how the use of VR goggles and motion controllers affects the accuracy of localizing acoustic stimuli and the subjective comfort of participants, compared to a WEB-based application operated with a mouse. The study was performed for 16 azimuthal samples (0° elevation) and 8 elevation samples at azimuth 90°. Mean absolute angular errors (MAAE) were analyzed, and the paired-samples t-tests were performed. The results show that using the VR interface can reduce horizontal MAAE by 7° compared to the WEB-based interface. In the elevation tasks, no statistically significant differences were observed. Respondents rated VR the highest in terms of intuitiveness, comfort, speed, and perceived precision. These findings confirm the potential of VR to be used in localization tests, especially in the horizontal plane, and suggest directions for further research on HRTF personalization and interface optimization for elevation tasks.

Keywords:

virtual reality (VR), spatial sound localization, user experience

References


  1. Ahrens A., Lund K.D., Marschall M., Dau T. (2019), Sound source localization with varying amount of visual information in virtual reality, PLOS ONE, 14(3): e0214603, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214603

  2. Bronkhorst A.W. (1995), Localization of real and virtual sound sources, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 98(5): 2542–2553, https://doi.org/10.1121/1.413219

  3. Fujii A., Ohsugi Y., Yamamoto Y., Nakamura T., Sugiura T., Tauchi M. (2007), Comparison of different pointing methods for sound localizability measurement in the vision impaired subjects, Journal of Physiological Anthropology, 26(3): 381–385, https://doi.org/10.2114/jpa2.26.381

  4. Haber L., Haber R.N., Penningroth S., Novak K., Radgowski H. (1993), Comparison of nine methods of indicating the direction to objects: data from blind adults, Perception, 22(1): 35–47, https://doi.org/10.1068/p220035

  5. Mason R., Ford N., Rumsey F., de Bruyn B. (2001), Verbal and nonverbal elicitation techniques in the subjective assessment of spatial sound reproduction, Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, 49(5): 366–384.

  6. Oldfield S.R., Parker S.P.A. (1984), Acuity of sound localisation: a topography of auditory space. I. Normal hearing conditions, Perception, 13(5): 581–600, https://doi.org/10.1068/p130581

  7. Valzolgher C., Capra S., Sum K., Pavani F., Picinali L. (2023), Training spatial hearing skills in virtual reality through a sound-reaching task, [in:] Forum Acusticum 2023 (Torino, Italy), https://doi.org/10.61782/fa.2023.0341