Examination of Low-Frequency Sound Decay in Two Connected Enclosed Spaces Having Different Sound Absorption on Boundary Surfaces

Downloads

Authors

  • Mirosław Meissner Institute of Fundamental Technological Research, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland ORCID ID 0000-0003-3885-0273

Abstract

In this study, a sound decay in two connected enclosed spaces was investigated. The research concerned the low-frequency range, because in this situation the sound decay is predominantly non-exponential. Numerical simulations were performed for a system of two connected rectangular subrooms. The larger subroom was highly reverberant, while the smaller subroom had walls that provided moderate sound damping. Simulation results showed that after switching off the harmonic source, a non-exponential behavior of sound decay is usually observed. This is because many eigenmodes are involved in the sound decay, hence this process strongly depends on both the source frequency and its position. Reverberant properties of the system were also determined using energy decay curves calculated by the reverse-time integration of the squared room impulse response. Simulations showed that the effect of the significant difference in sound absorption in subrooms is a wide range of modal reverberation time values, i.e., it is large for eigenmodes localized in a highly reverberant room and small for eigenmodes localized in a damped room. The analyzed room system is therefore characterized by an interesting feature resulting from the localization of eigenmodes. When the source is located in the larger subroom, slowly decaying modes localized in this subroom dominate the sound decay process. However, when the source is located in the smaller subroom, the sound decay in the larger subroom is much faster since non-localized modes with a shorter modal reverberation time are excited within this subroom.

Keywords:

coupled spaces, sound decay, sound absorption, room impulse response, decay times, localization of eigenmodes, modal reverberation time

References


  1. Bradley D.T., Wang L.M. (2007), Comparison of measured and computer-modeled objective parameters for an existing coupled volume concert hall, Building Acoustics, 14(2): 79–90, https://doi.org/10.1260/135101007781448028

  2. Bradley D.T., Wang L.M. (2009), Quantifying the double slope effect in coupled volume room systems, Building Acoustics, 16(2): 105–123, https://doi.org/10.1260/135101009788913275

  3. Bradley D.T., Wang L.M. (2010), Optimum absorption and aperture parameters for realistic coupled volume spaces determined from computational analysis and subjective testing results, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 127(1): 223–232, https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3268604

  4. Damelin S.B., Miller W. (2012), The Mathematics of Signal Processing, Cambridge University Press, New York.

  5. Dance S.M., Van Buuren G. (2013), Effects of damping on the low-frequency acoustics of listening rooms based on an analytical model, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 332(25): 6891–6904, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2013.07.011

  6. Das O., Abel J.S. (2021), Grouped feedback delay networks for modeling of coupled spaces, Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, 69(7/8): 486–496, https://doi.org/10.17743/jaes.2021.0026

  7. Ermann M., Johnson M. (2005), Exposure and materiality of the secondary room and its impact on the impulse response of coupled-volume concert halls, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 284(3–5): 915–931, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2004.07.030

  8. Giron S., Alvarez-Morales L., Zamarreno T. (2017), Church acoustics: a state-of-the-art review after several decades of research, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 411: 378–408, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2017.09.015

  9. Jasa T., Xiang N. (2009), Efficient estimation of decay parameters in acoustically coupled-spaces using slice sampling, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(3): 1269–1279, https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3158934

  10. Kak S.C. (1970), The discrete Hilbert transform, Proceedings of the IEEE, 58(4): 585–586, https://doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1970.7696

  11. Kinsler L.E., Frey A.R., Coppens A.B., Sander J.V. (2000), Fundamentals of Acoustics, 4th ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York.

  12. Kuttruff H. (2017), Room Acoustics, 6th ed., CRC Press, New York.

  13. Luizard P., Katz B.F.G. (2014), Investigation of the effective aperture area of sliding and hinged doors between coupled spaces, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 136(2): 1269–1279, http://doi.org/10.1121/1.4890202

  14. Luizard P., Polack J-D., Katz B.F.G. (2014), Sound energy decay in coupled spaces using a parametric analytical solution of a diffusion equation, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 135(5): 2765–2776, http://doi.org/10.1121/1.4870706

  15. Luizard P., Katz B.F.G., Guastavino C. (2015), Perceived suitability of reverberation in large coupled volume concert halls, Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, and Brain, 25(3): 317–325, https://doi.org/10.1037/pmu0000109

  16. Martellotta F. (2016), Understanding the acoustics of Papal Basilicas in Rome by means of a coupled-volumes approach, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 382: 413–427, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2016.07.007

  17. Meissner M. (2009), Spectral characteristics and localization of modes in acoustically coupled enclosures, Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 95(2): 300–305, https://doi.org/10.3813/AAA.918152

  18. Meissner M. (2010), Simulation of acoustical properties of coupled rooms using numerical technique based on modal expansion, Acta Physica Polonica A, 118(1): 123–127, https://doi.org/10.12693/APhysPolA.118.123

  19. Meissner M. (2012), Acoustic energy density distribution and sound intensity vector field inside coupled spaces, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 132(1): 228–238, https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4726030

  20. Meissner M., Wiśniewski K. (2019), Influence of room modes on low-frequency transients: theoretical modeling and numerical predictions, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 448: 19–33, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2019.02.012

  21. Meissner M., Wiśniewski K. (2020), Investigation of damping effects on low-frequency steady-state acoustical behaviour of coupled spaces, Royal Society Open Science, 7(8): 200514, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200514

  22. Nijs L., Jansens G., Vermeir G., van der Voorden M. (2002), Absorbing surfaces in ray-tracing programs for coupled spaces, Applied Acoustics, 63(6): 611–626, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-682X(01)00063-9

  23. Paris E.T. (1928), On the coefficient of sound-absorption measured by the reverberation method, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 5(29): 489–497, https://doi.org/10.1080/14786440308565092

  24. Schroeder M.R. (1965), New method of measuring reverberation time, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 37(3): 409–412, https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1909343

  25. Schroeder M.R. (1996), The “Schroeder frequency” revisited, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99(5): 3240–3241, https://doi.org/10.1121/1.414868

  26. Shi S., Jin G., Xiao B., Liu Z. (2018), Acoustic modeling and eigenanalysis of coupled rooms with a transparent coupling aperture of variable size, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 419: 352–366, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2018.01.024

  27. Summers J.E., Torres R.R., Shimizu Y. (2004), Statistical-acoustics models of energy decay in systems of coupled rooms and their relation to geometrical acoustics, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116(2): 958–969, https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1763974

  28. Summers J.E., Torres R.R., Shimizu Y., Dalenbak B-I.L. (2005), Adapting a randomized beam-axis-tracing algorithm to modeling of coupled rooms via late-part ray tracing, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118(3): 1491–1502, https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2000772

  29. Summers J.E. (2012), Accounting for delay of energy transfer between coupled rooms in statistical-acoustics models of reverberant-energy decay, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 132(2): 129–134, https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4734591

  30. Su Gul Z., Odabas E., Xiang N., Caliscan M. (2019), Diffusion equation modeling for sound energy flow analysis in multi domain structures, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 145(4): 2703–2717, https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5095877

  31. Su Gul Z. (2021), Exploration of room acoustics coupling in Hagia Sophia of Istanbul for its different states, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 149(1): 320–339, https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0002971

  32. Thydal T., Pind F., Jeong C.-H., Engsig-Karup A.P. (2021), Experimental validation and uncertainty quantification in wave-based computational room acoustics, Applied Acoustics, 178: 107939, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2021.107939

  33. Vorlander M. (2020), Auralization: Fundamentals of Acoustics, Modelling, Simulation, Algorithms and Acoustic Virtual Reality, 2nd ed., Springer, Berlin.

  34. Xiang N., Jing Y., Bockman A.C. (2009), Investigation of acoustically coupled enclosures using a diffusion-equation model, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(3): 1187–1198, https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3168507

  35. Xiang N., Goggans P., Jasa T., Robinson P. (2011), Bayesian characterization of multiple-slope sound energy decays in coupled-volume systems, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129(2): 741–752, https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3518773