Speed-Confounded Before–After Assessment of Tramway Pass-By Noise Under Track-Renewal Field Conditions

Downloads

Authors

Abstract

This study investigates the system-level acoustic response of the tramway track renewal under real urban operating conditions, with emphasis on the confounding role of operating speed in before–after comparisons. Pass-by noise measurements were conducted on a tram route in Poznań before (2022) and after (2025) renewal, when a conventional ballasted track was replaced by a ballastless system. During the same period, the mean pass-by speed increased from 25.9 km/h to 58.1 km/h. Energetic, psychoacoustic, and spectral indicators were analysed using direct comparisons, quartile-based speed sensitivities, and an integrated year–speed–tram type regression model. The direct comparison showed an increase in LAeq of +3.37 dB, while SEL remained nearly unchanged (Δ ≈ −0.06 dB), indicating that higher instantaneous levels were largely offset by shorter pass-by durations. Spectral analysis revealed lower measured levels of approximately 4 dB to 11 dB in the 125 Hz to 200 Hz range and localised increases of up to 7 dB to 11 dB around 1.6 kHz to 2 kHz. Quartile-based per-km/h derivatives indicated lower 2025 local sensitivities for LAeq, SEL, and loudness N in the pooled dataset. However, speed-doubling sensitivities showed that this apparent flattening was partly scale-dependent and not uniform across quantiles. The integrated model provided supportive evidence for changed metric–speed relationships, particularly for LAeq, although common-reference slope estimates were partly extrapolative because of limited speed overlap. The results demonstrate the usefulness of speed-sensitive analysis for interpreting before–after tramway noise measurements under changing operating regimes and should be regarded as system-level field-condition responses rather than isolated causal effects of track renewal.

Keywords:

rolling noise, tramway noise, track renewal, spectral analysis, psychoacoustics, sound exposure level

References


  1. American National Standards Institute (2025), Measurement of sound pressure levels in air (ANSI/ASA S1.13-2020 (R2025) Standard).

  2. Andres V.T., Martinez-Casas J., Denia F.D., Thompson D.J. (2022), Influence study of rail geometry and track properties on railway rolling noise, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 525: 116701, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2021.116701

  3. City of Poznań (2022), Strategic noise map of the city of Poznań 2022 – report [in Polish: Strategiczna mapa hałasu miasta Poznania 2022 – raport], Poznań, Poland.

  4. Craven N.J., Kerry G. (2007), A Good Practice Guide on the Sources and Magnitude of Uncertainty Arising in the Practical Measurement of Environmental Noise, DTI Project: 2.2.1 - National Measurement System Programme for Acoustical Metrology, University of Salford.

  5. European Standard (2019), Railway applications – noise emission – rail and wheel roughness measurement related to rolling noise generation (EN 15610:2019 Standard).

  6. International Association of Public Transport (UITP) (2019), Public transport: moving Europe forward 2014–2019, Brussels.

  7. International Organization for Standardization (2013), Railway applications – acoustics – measurement of noise emitted by railbound vehicles, International Organization for Standardization (ISO Standard No. 3095:2013), https://www.iso.org/standard/55726.html

  8. International Organization for Standardization (2017), Acoustics – Methods for calculating loudness – part 1: Zwicker method (ISO Standard No. 532-1:2017), https://www.iso.org/standard/63077.html

  9. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (JCGM) (2008), Evaluation of measurement data – guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement.

  10. Jones C.J.C., Thompson D.J., Diehl R.J. (2006), The use of decay rates to analyse the performance of railway track in rolling noise generation, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 293(3–5): 485–495, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2005.08.060

  11. Kryter K.D. (1962), Methods for the calculation and use of the articulation index, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 34(11): 1689–1697, https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1909094

  12. Lakusić S., Dragcević V., Rukavina T. (2005), The impact of tram track fastening systems on noise level, WIT Transactions on The Built Environment, 77: 487–497, https://doi.org/10.2495/UT050471

  13. Nowakowski T., Firlik B., Staśkiewicz T. (2019), Developing assumptions for the tram noise attenuation passive system using the noise maps analysis method, Archives of Acoustics, 44(4): 783–792, https://doi.org/10.24425/aoa.2019.129733

  14. Nowakowski T., Komorski P. (2024), Tram noise annoyance: the role of different psychoacoustic measures in the assessment of noise, Applied Acoustics, 219: 109946, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2024.109946

  15. OpenAerialMap (n.d.), OpenAerialMap viewer, https://map.openaerialmap.org/ (access: 20.05.2026).

  16. Remington P.J. (1976), Wheel/rail noise – part IV: rolling noise, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 46(3): 419–436, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(76)90864-6

  17. Sun W., Thompson D., Toward M., Wiseman M., Ntotsios E., Byrne S. (2020), The influence of track design on the rolling noise from trams, Applied Acoustics, 170: 107536, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107536

  18. Terhardt E., Stoll G., Seewann M. (1982), Algorithm for extraction of pitch and pitch salience from complex tonal signals, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 71(3): 679–688, https://doi.org/10.1121/1.387544

  19. Tetsuya H., Yano T., Murakami Y. (2017), Annoyance due to railway noise before and after the opening of the Kyushu Shinkansen Line, Applied Acoustics, 115: 173–180, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2016.09.004

  20. Thompson D.J. (2009), Railway Noise and Vibration: Mechanisms, Modelling and Means of Control, 1st ed., Elsevier, Oxford.

  21. Thompson D.J., Jones C.J.C. (2000), A review of the modelling of wheel/rail noise generation, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 231(3): 519–536, https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1999.2542

  22. Vincent N., Bouvet P., Thompson D.J., Gautier P.E. (1996), Theoretical optimization of track components to reduce rolling noise, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 193(1): 161–171, https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1996.0255

  23. Zhang X., Hou X., Thompson D., Li Q., Zhu J. (2026), A method of economic evaluation of noise mitigation measures in urban rail transit, International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtst.2025.08.006